
NRAWinningTeam.com
|
|
NRA-ILA FAX ALERT |
| (800) 392-8683 |
Fax: (703) 267-3918 |
groots@nra.org |
| Vol. 8, No. 40 |
11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030 |
10/5/2001 |
Bellesiles Ordered To Respond To Critics
|
"...[T]he
evidence is so overwhelming that it is incumbent upon Bellesiles as a
serious scholar to respond. He either has to admit error, or somehow
show how his work is right..." |
|
|
-- Gerald Rosenberg, University of Chicago Law School |
|

Prof. Rosenberg |
Michael Bellesiles, author of the controversial book Arming America: The
Origins of a National Gun Culture, has been told he must defend the
oft-criticized "research" that was the basis of his book. Bellesiles is
currently an historian at Emory University, and the clamor of
controversy surrounding his book has reached such a volume that
James
Melton, Emory's history department chairman, told the Boston Globe
Bellesiles must "defend himself and the integrity of his scholarship
immediately." The book, according to the author, is a culmination of
research that indicates that most Americans around the time of our
country's formation did not own firearms. This, of course, is contrary
to reams of scholarly research showing that America has always been a
nation where the possession of firearms by responsible, law-abiding,
private citizens has been widespread.

Prof. Volokh |
While this book initially received high praise from gun-ban extremists
and the anti-gun media (the New York Times actually gave the book praise
before it was ever released), numerous historians and journalists have
since raised extensive criticism of Bellesiles' research.
Gerald
Rosenberg, a visiting professor of law at Northwestern University, told
the Wall Street Journal's Kimberley Strassel in April, "...[T]he
evidence is so overwhelming that it is incumbent upon Bellesiles as a
serious scholar to respond. He either has to admit error, or somehow
show how his work is right."

Prof. Malcolm |
Strassel's April 5
article mentioned several other critics of
Bellesiles, including UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh, who has pointed
to examples of Bellesiles either misquoting sources, or citing sources
that do not contain the information the Emory professor claims they
contain;
Bentley College history professor Joyce Lee Malcolm, author of
To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American Right;
Northwestern professor of law
James Lindgren, who has tackled what many
reviewers have considered to be the most compelling aspect of Bellesiles
research - his use of probate records (Lindgren came up with starkly
different results showing widespread ownership of firearms in early
America); and
Randolph Roth, an associate history professor at Ohio
State University who examined Lindgren's work on probate records and
commented that "it looks as though Mr. Bellesiles' work won't be
reproducible."

Prof. Lindgren |
According to Strassel, Bellesiles told her that many of his critics are
"ideologically motivated," but she points out that Rosenberg and
Lindgren all told her that they favor gun control. Bellesiles has also
revealed that he did not keep a database (rather odd in the age of
computers), but kept all his data on paper notes, which he claims were
destroyed in a flood.

Ms. Seckora |
Even more recently, Melissa Seckora of National Review called
Bellesiles' research "one of the worst cases of academic
irresponsibility in memory." In an article originally posted to the
Internet on September 11, but which can now be found in the
October 15
issue of National Review (as well as online at
http://www.nationalreview.com/15oct01/seckora101501.shtml), Seckora
reveals that Bellesiles' claim of having researched San Francisco
probate records from the 1840s and 1850s seems to be a complete
fabrication. According to Seckora, every source Bellesiles cited for
these probate records indicated the records did not exist, as all were
destroyed in the San Francisco earthquake and fire of 1906.
While we certainly look forward to the detailed defense of his research
Bellesiles has been told to produce, it is likely it will simply inspire
a new round of questions from historians.
Related Stories... Columbia University Set to Honor Controversial Researcher
Support Mounts for Individual Rights Theory
|
|
|