NRAWinningTeam.com
Search this site:

Advanced


Support Our Troops with Project Bore Snake
 
Wayne v. CNN

Marion Hammer
On CNN Fabrications


Good Media

Write Your Reps


Karl Malone is NRA
Click On Me!

 

NRA-ILA FAX ALERT

(800) 392-8683 Fax: (703) 267-3918 groots@nra.org
Vol. 8, No. 32 11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030 8/10/2001


California's Supreme Court Rejects
Brady Bunch's Reckless Suit

"...The suit against Navegar may have been the crown jewel in the gun-ban movement's ongoing attempt to bankrupt the lawful firearm industry..."  


Justices voting to support CA
law, from left-to-right --
Associate Justice Ming W. Chin,
Chief Justice Ronald M. George,
Associate Justice Marvin R. Baxter,
Associate Justice Joyce L. Kennard,
Associate Justice Janice R. Brown

The gun-ban lobby formerly known as HCI/CPHV was dealt yet another crushing defeat in the courts on Monday when the California Supreme Court handed down an overwhelming 5 to 1 majority ruling that stated the obvious: gun makers cannot be held responsible when their lawful products are used in the commission of violent crimes.

The suit, Merrill v. Navegar, was originally filed in 1994 by HCI/CPHV's Legal Action Project as an attempt to hold Navegar, Inc., a Florida-based gun maker, responsible for the 1993 murderous rampage by Gian Luigi Ferri at a San Francisco office building. In 1997, the suit was dismissed by a trial judge, but a narrow 2 to 1 appellate court ruling in 1999 allowed the case to continue. Monday's decision reversed the 1999 decision, ruling the suit was prevented by a 1983 law prohibiting civil cases against the manufacturer of defectless, lawful firearms.

The suit against Navegar may have been the crown jewel in the gun-ban movement's ongoing attempt to bankrupt the lawful firearm industry with exorbitant legal expenses. In 1999, the Legal Action Project hailed the appellate ruling as a "historic victory," and claimed it would have "far-reaching implications" for similar suits.

But Sarah Brady's legal team is clearly as out of step with judicial trends as it is with mainstream America. The courts have consistently rejected these attempts to further the anti-gun agenda by using the judiciary to bypass the people's elected representatives, and poll after poll shows the general public abhors these abuses of our judicial system.

The California ruling is the second by a state supreme court rejecting reckless lawsuits, and numerous lower-level courts have handed down similar rulings.


Related Stories...
More Info About Reckless Lawsuits Against Gun-Makers
Oct 2000 - U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Petition to Review Navegar v. U.S.
Oct 1999 - Charges Dropped Against Judge

 



NRA Home Page NRA Members' Councils of California