NRAWinningTeam.com
Search this site:

Advanced


Support Our Troops with Project Bore Snake
 
Wayne v. CNN

Marion Hammer
On CNN Fabrications


Good Media

Write Your Reps


NRA Members' Rights Protected!
Click On Me!

 

NRA-ILA FAX ALERT

(800) 392-8683 Fax: (703) 267-3918 groots@nra.org
Vol. 8, No.1 11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030 1/5/2001


Maryland Law Creates
"de facto BAN" On Handguns

"...one of the bill's most powerful proponents... commented that the new law has actually created a "de facto ban" on some firearms that are completely legal..."  


   Rep. Ehrlich (R-Md)
Maryland's "ballistic fingerprinting" requirement has had a chilling effect on the lawful sale of handguns in the not-so-"Free State." Many new handguns, perfectly legal in most states, are simply not coming into Maryland, which means the supply for any law-abiding citizen who hopes to buy a new handgun is drying up.

It seems that many gun makers are not able or willing to comply with Maryland's requirement that any handgun manufactured after October 1, 2000, that is intended to be sold in Maryland, include with the firearm a shell casing from a round of ammunition that has been fired from that handgun, along with identifying information on the handgun and the casing. The casing and information is then stored at the Maryland State Police Crime Laboratory, creating, in effect, a handgun registration system.

When the problem of gun makers and distributors not shipping new handguns into Maryland was brought to the attention of U.S. Rep. Robert Ehrlich, Jr. (R-Md.), last October, he immediately sent a letter of inquiry to Col. David B. Mitchell, the Maryland State Police Superintendent. Rep. Ehrlich, a solid friend of Maryland's gun owners, asked Col. Mitchell for "a detailed accounting of handgun manufacturers or distributers who have given notice...of their intent to provide handguns for sale in Maryland." The response, which came on December 13, confirmed many fears. Mitchell stated that his investigation found that

  • nine manufacturers have "prohibited distributers from transporting their handguns to Maryland,"
  • three others may comply with the new requirement, but have not begun to yet, and
  • three more have stated they will supply "only limited models."
At the core of the confusion is the simple fact that the firearm distribution system employed by most manufacturers is not designed to segregate guns by state.

As the supply of legal handguns available to Maryland's gun owners and gun dealers starts to diminish, even some of the sponsors of the legislation are beginning to realize there is a real problem. Maryland House Speaker Casper R. Taylor, Jr. (D-Allegany), one of the bill's most powerful proponents when it was under debate, commented that the new law has actually created a "de facto ban" on some firearms that are completely legal.

According to an article in the December 29, 2000 issue of the Washington Post, Taylor sent a letter to Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran, Jr. (D) requesting he "reinterpret the law to make clear that gun makers unwilling to supply shell casings may continue to ship their weapons to Maryland." Curran responded by stating the state police can determine whether a gun dealer may sell a handgun when a manufacturer has not supplied a shell casing. But Curran's office also stated any handguns sent without casings can be seized.

This "Catch 22" should come as no surprise, as Curran is the same AG who stated in 1999, "Our public policy goal must be to rid our communities of handguns."


Related Stories...
More Info About Maryland

 



NRA Home Page NRA Members' Councils of California