NRAWinningTeam.com
Search this site:

Advanced


Support Our Troops with Project Bore Snake
 
Wayne v. CNN

Marion Hammer
On CNN Fabrications


Good Media

Write Your Reps


Karl Malone is NRA
Click On Me!

 

NRA-ILA FAX ALERT

(800) 392-8683 Fax: (703) 267-3918 groots@nra.org
Vol. 8, No.1 11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030 1/5/2001


Florida Court Upholds Privacy Rights
of NRA Members

"...We have never and will never release our membership information. We will not release ten names nor one single name, period..."  
-- NRA Past President/USF Founder Marion P. Hammer  


Marion Hammer
NRA and Unified Sportsmen of Florida (USF), an NRA affiliate led by NRA Past President Marion P. Hammer, won a significant court victory on December 27, 2000, when the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, ruled that the identity of members of these organizations need not be disclosed in a lawsuit.

This issue arose when the City of South Miami, in response to a suit filed against it by NRA and USF, demanded a list of the names and addresses of all NRA and USF members who live in the City. The original NRA/USF suit, which is still pending, was filed because the City had enacted a law mandating trigger locks be used to secure all firearms - a violation of Florida's statewide preemption law, and a conflict with state law that allows firearms to be secured by many other methods.

Speaking on behalf of both NRA and USF, Hammer called the City's demand for the names of members "nothing more than harassment." The City even went so far as to demand a list of members who own firearms, along with information on how they store their firearms.

Hammer went on to call the City's effort "nothing less than a devious political attempt to try to force us to give up our constitutional right to privacy in order to exercise our right to seek relief in the courts - from the illegal actions of local anti-gun politicians."

When a lower court ordered that NRA and USF disclose at least 10 members, Hammer stated, "We have never and will never release our membership information. We will not release ten names nor one single name, period." In its reversal of the lower court's ruling, the Court of Appeals held: "We are not convinced that simply because the Associations filed the action as plaintiffs, they have waived their privacy rights concerning the members' names. The discovery of the names should not have been ordered. We therefore quash the order."


Related Stories...
More Florida Info
Marion Hammer Responds to Texas Catholic
Marion Hammer Bio

 



NRA Home Page NRA Members' Councils of California